5-149028259-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_024577.4(SH3TC2):c.1473C>T(p.Phe491=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000344 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
SH3TC2
NM_024577.4 synonymous
NM_024577.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.22
Genes affected
SH3TC2 (HGNC:29427): (SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeats 2) This gene encodes a protein with two N-terminal Src homology 3 (SH3) domains and 10 tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motifs, and is a member of a small gene family. The gene product has been proposed to be an adapter or docking molecule. Mutations in this gene result in autosomal recessive Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C, a childhood-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by demyelination of motor and sensory neurons. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 5-149028259-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-149028259-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 378578.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.22 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00196 (299/152354) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00712 (296/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00645. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 146 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH3TC2 | NM_024577.4 | c.1473C>T | p.Phe491= | synonymous_variant | 11/17 | ENST00000515425.6 | NP_078853.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH3TC2 | ENST00000515425.6 | c.1473C>T | p.Phe491= | synonymous_variant | 11/17 | 1 | NM_024577.4 | ENSP00000423660 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00196 AC: 299AN: 152236Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
299
AN:
152236
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000550 AC: 138AN: 251132Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000383 AC XY: 52AN XY: 135768
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
138
AN:
251132
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
135768
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000176 AC: 257AN: 1461664Hom.: 1 Cov.: 80 AF XY: 0.000143 AC XY: 104AN XY: 727116
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
257
AN:
1461664
Hom.:
Cov.:
80
AF XY:
AC XY:
104
AN XY:
727116
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00196 AC: 299AN: 152354Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00196 AC XY: 146AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
299
AN:
152354
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
146
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 26, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 11, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
SH3TC2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 05, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 21, 2018 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at