5-149980602-CTTGTTG-CTTG
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 13 ACMG points: 13P and 0B. PS3PM4_SupportingPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000112.4(SLC26A2):c.1020_1022delTGT(p.Val341del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000644 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). ClinVar reports functional evidence for this variant: "SCV000329831: Published functional studies demonstrate abnormal sulfate transporter activity (Superti-Furga et al. 1996; Karniski et al. 2004); SCV004562301: Functional characterization of the variant protein demonstrates reduced protein expression and abnormal sulfate transporter activity (Karniski 2001, Karniski 2004, Superti-Furga 1996).; SCV000695414: The variant has been reported in multiple affected individuals in the homozygous and compound heterozygous state, and has been shown to result in impaired ability for sulfate uptake in HEK cells (comparable to negative control cells). In these transfected cells, the protein is not detected by either immunoblot analysis or confocal immunofluorescent microscopy, suggesting that this mutation is either poorly expressed or the protein is rapidly degraded in mammalian cells (Karniski_2004).; SCV001214201: Experimental studies have shown that this variant affects SLC26A2 function (PMID:11448940).; SCV005416100: Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.; SCV002060333: Functional assessments of this variant are available in the literature (PMID:11448940, 15294877).". Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V340V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000112.4 disruptive_inframe_deletion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- achondrogenesis type IBInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- atelosteogenesis type IIInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Orphanet
- diastrophic dysplasiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- multiple epiphyseal dysplasiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, G2P
- SLC26A2-related skeletal dysplasiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- skeletal dysplasiaInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000112.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC26A2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1020_1022delTGT | p.Val341del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000286298.4 | P50443 | ||
| SLC26A2 | c.1020_1022delTGT | p.Val341del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000532140.1 | ||||
| SLC26A2 | c.1020_1022delTGT | p.Val341del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000532141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000119 AC: 30AN: 251132 AF XY: 0.000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000664 AC: 97AN: 1461764Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000811 AC XY: 59AN XY: 727194 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74440 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at