5-149981314-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000112.4(SLC26A2):c.1721T>C(p.Ile574Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.99 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 791,001 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000112.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.993 AC: 151159AN: 152200Hom.: 75063 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.993 AC: 249577AN: 251316Hom.: 123937 AF XY: 0.993 AC XY: 134896AN XY: 135850
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.990 AC: 1446695AN: 1461840Hom.: 715876 Cov.: 65 AF XY: 0.990 AC XY: 719789AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.993 AC: 151280AN: 152318Hom.: 75125 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.993 AC XY: 74005AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
- -
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
- -
- -
Achondrogenesis, type IB Benign:2
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Atelosteogenesis type II Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4 Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Diastrophic dysplasia;C0265274:Achondrogenesis, type IB;C1847593:Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4;C1850554:Atelosteogenesis type II Benign:1
- -
Sulfate transporter-related osteochondrodysplasia Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Diastrophic dysplasia Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at