5-16668281-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_012334.3(MYO10):āc.6071G>Cā(p.Ser2024Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00272 in 1,608,546 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 80 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012334.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO10 | NM_012334.3 | c.6071G>C | p.Ser2024Thr | missense_variant | 40/41 | ENST00000513610.6 | NP_036466.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO10 | ENST00000513610.6 | c.6071G>C | p.Ser2024Thr | missense_variant | 40/41 | 1 | NM_012334.3 | ENSP00000421280 | P1 | |
RETREG1-AS1 | ENST00000653650.1 | n.330-10553C>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0140 AC: 2126AN: 152190Hom.: 46 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00391 AC: 950AN: 243214Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00284 AC XY: 375AN XY: 131958
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00154 AC: 2248AN: 1456238Hom.: 34 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00133 AC XY: 965AN XY: 724290
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0140 AC: 2128AN: 152308Hom.: 46 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0133 AC XY: 994AN XY: 74474
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at