5-170067575-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 3P and 16B. PM2PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1
The NM_004946.3(DOCK2):c.4533G>T(p.Met1511Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000182 in 1,614,184 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004946.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCK2 | NM_004946.3 | c.4533G>T | p.Met1511Ile | missense_variant | 45/52 | ENST00000520908.7 | |
DOCK2 | NR_156756.1 | n.4636G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 46/53 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCK2 | ENST00000520908.7 | c.4533G>T | p.Met1511Ile | missense_variant | 45/52 | 2 | NM_004946.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00109 AC: 166AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000262 AC: 66AN: 251430Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000184 AC XY: 25AN XY: 135882
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000876 AC: 128AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000756 AC XY: 55AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00109 AC: 166AN: 152310Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00117 AC XY: 87AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
DOCK2 deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 24, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at