5-177246772-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_022455.5(NSD1):​c.4473G>T​(p.Ser1491Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000471 in 1,613,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00046 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

NSD1
NM_022455.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.531
Variant links:
Genes affected
NSD1 (HGNC:14234): (nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 1) This gene encodes a protein containing a SET domain, 2 LXXLL motifs, 3 nuclear translocation signals (NLSs), 4 plant homeodomain (PHD) finger regions, and a proline-rich region. The encoded protein enhances androgen receptor (AR) transactivation, and this enhancement can be increased further in the presence of other androgen receptor associated coregulators. This protein may act as a nucleus-localized, basic transcriptional factor and also as a bifunctional transcriptional regulator. Mutations of this gene have been associated with Sotos syndrome and Weaver syndrome. One version of childhood acute myeloid leukemia is the result of a cryptic translocation with the breakpoints occurring within nuclear receptor-binding Su-var, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax domain protein 1 on chromosome 5 and nucleoporin, 98-kd on chromosome 11. Multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2018]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 5-177246772-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-177246772-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 96058.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.531 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000591 (90/152308) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00438 (67/15302). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00354. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 53 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 90 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NSD1NM_022455.5 linkc.4473G>T p.Ser1491Ser synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 23 ENST00000439151.7 NP_071900.2 Q96L73-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NSD1ENST00000439151.7 linkc.4473G>T p.Ser1491Ser synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 23 1 NM_022455.5 ENSP00000395929.2 Q96L73-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000591
AC:
90
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00196
AC:
493
AN:
251462
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00143
AC XY:
194
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0130
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00120
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000459
AC:
670
AN:
1460858
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000385
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
726772
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000598
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00282
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000207
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000591
AC:
90
AN:
152308
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000712
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000174
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00130
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 19, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 13, 2017
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sotos syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Aug 03, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
2.9
DANN
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150920473; hg19: chr5-176673773; API