5-177246772-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_022455.5(NSD1):c.4473G>T(p.Ser1491Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000471 in 1,613,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022455.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000591 AC: 90AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00196 AC: 493AN: 251462Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00143 AC XY: 194AN XY: 135898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000459 AC: 670AN: 1460858Hom.: 5 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000385 AC XY: 280AN XY: 726772
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000591 AC: 90AN: 152308Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000712 AC XY: 53AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Sotos syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at