5-177295276-C-T

Position:

chr5-177295276-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_022455.5(NSD1):c.7908C>T(p.Leu2636=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0006 in 1,614,254 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00061 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

NSD1
NM_022455.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0280

Variant links:

Genes affected

NSD1 (HGNC:14234): (nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 1) This gene encodes a protein containing a SET domain, 2 LXXLL motifs, 3 nuclear translocation signals (NLSs), 4 plant homeodomain (PHD) finger regions, and a proline-rich region. The encoded protein enhances androgen receptor (AR) transactivation, and this enhancement can be increased further in the presence of other androgen receptor associated coregulators. This protein may act as a nucleus-localized, basic transcriptional factor and also as a bifunctional transcriptional regulator. Mutations of this gene have been associated with Sotos syndrome and Weaver syndrome. One version of childhood acute myeloid leukemia is the result of a cryptic translocation with the breakpoints occurring within nuclear receptor-binding Su-var, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax domain protein 1 on chromosome 5 and nucleoporin, 98-kd on chromosome 11. Multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2018]

NSD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).

BP6

Variant 5-177295276-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-177295276-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 159443.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-177295276-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.028 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000612 (894/1461890) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0109 (63/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00876. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 473 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 75 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NSD1	NM_022455.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.7908C>T	p.Leu2636=	synonymous_variant	23/23	ENST00000439151.7	NP_071900.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NSD1	ENST00000439151.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.7908C>T	p.Leu2636=	synonymous_variant	23/23	1	NM_022455.5	ENSP00000395929	P2	Q96L73-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000493

AC:

AN:

152246

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00519

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000617

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000769

AC:

193

AN:

250994

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000921

AC XY:

125

AN XY:

135728

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000347

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00457

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000915

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000847

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00179

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000612

AC:

894

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000650

AC XY:

473

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000119

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000402

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00505

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000777

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000487

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00113

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000492

AC:

AN:

152364

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000362

AC XY:

AN XY:

74512

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00519

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000617

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.000834

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000646

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00125

EpiControl

AF:

0.00124

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Aug 01, 2024	NSD1: BP4, BP7, BS1 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -

not specified

Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 11, 2015	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Aug 21, 2015	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Feb 08, 2013	- -

Sotos syndrome

Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 15, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics	Jul 08, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Oct 29, 2022	- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 18, 2016

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

NSD1-related disorder

Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Aug 03, 2022

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.52

CADD

Benign

2.7

DANN

Benign

0.63

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over