5-179114023-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_014244.5(ADAMTS2):​c.3480C>A​(p.Ala1160Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0019 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 59 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A1160A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 24 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 35 hom. )

Consequence

ADAMTS2
NM_014244.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.88

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ADAMTS2 (HGNC:218): (ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 2) This gene encodes a member of the ADAMTS (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs) protein family. Members of the family share several distinct protein modules, including a propeptide region, a metalloproteinase domain, a disintegrin-like domain, and a thrombospondin type 1 (TS) motif. Individual members of this family differ in the number of C-terminal TS motifs, and some have unique C-terminal domains. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the mature procollagen N-proteinase. This proteinase excises the N-propeptide of the fibrillar procollagens types I-III and type V. Mutations in this gene cause Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIC, a recessively inherited connective-tissue disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes an isoform that is proteolytically processed. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2016]
ADAMTS2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, dermatosparaxis type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 5-179114023-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-179114023-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 353085.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.88 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00997 (1518/152214) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0346 (1435/41512). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0331. There are 24 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 701 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 24 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_014244.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ADAMTS2
NM_014244.5
MANE Select
c.3480C>Ap.Ala1160Ala
synonymous
Exon 22 of 22NP_055059.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ADAMTS2
ENST00000251582.12
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.3480C>Ap.Ala1160Ala
synonymous
Exon 22 of 22ENSP00000251582.7
ADAMTS2
ENST00000522937.1
TSL:2
n.*41C>A
downstream_gene
N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00992
AC:
1509
AN:
152096
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0345
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00765
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00247
AC:
622
AN:
251496
AF XY:
0.00172
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0349
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00127
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000651
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00105
AC:
1542
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000888
AC XY:
646
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0387
AC:
1295
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00174
AC:
78
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000116
AC:
10
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00260
AC:
15
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000261
AC:
29
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
115
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
108
217
325
434
542
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
42
84
126
168
210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00997
AC:
1518
AN:
152214
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00942
AC XY:
701
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0346
AC:
1435
AN:
41512
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00366
AC:
56
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000147
AC:
10
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00757
AC:
16
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
71
142
214
285
356
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00621
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.0113
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, dermatosparaxis type Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not specified Benign:1
Jan 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

ADAMTS2-related disorder Benign:1
May 20, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.78
CADD
Benign
0.098
DANN
Benign
0.44
PhyloP100
-2.9
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34437036; hg19: chr5-178541024; API