5-218352-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000651543.1(ENSG00000286001):​n.-4A>G variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00293 in 1,458,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 101 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 57 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 44 hom. )

Consequence

ENSG00000286001
ENST00000651543.1 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.05

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]
CCDC127 (HGNC:30520): (coiled-coil domain containing 127) Predicted to be integral component of membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 5-218352-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-218352-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 259243.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0512 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkc.-4A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 15 ENST00000264932.11 NP_004159.2 P31040-1A0A024QZ30
CCDC127NM_145265.3 linkc.-270T>C upstream_gene_variant ENST00000296824.4 NP_660308.1 Q96BQ5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ENSG00000286001ENST00000651543.1 linkn.-4A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 24 ENSP00000499215.1 A0A494C1T6
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkc.-4A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 15 1 NM_004168.4 ENSP00000264932.6 P31040-1
ENSG00000286001ENST00000651543.1 linkn.-4A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 24 ENSP00000499215.1 A0A494C1T6
CCDC127ENST00000296824.4 linkc.-270T>C upstream_gene_variant 1 NM_145265.3 ENSP00000296824.2 Q96BQ5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0153
AC:
2324
AN:
152118
Hom.:
56
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0530
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0158
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00296
AC:
332
AN:
112288
AF XY:
0.00230
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0482
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000735
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000140
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00174
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00148
AC:
1935
AN:
1306380
Hom.:
44
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00137
AC XY:
885
AN XY:
644652
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0544
AC:
1457
AN:
26784
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00292
AC:
72
AN:
24684
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000687
AC:
14
AN:
20380
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000323
AC:
1
AN:
30978
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000136
AC:
9
AN:
66116
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33824
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00351
AC:
13
AN:
3700
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000161
AC:
168
AN:
1046444
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00376
AC:
201
AN:
53470
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
83
166
248
331
414
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
60
120
180
240
300
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0153
AC:
2332
AN:
152226
Hom.:
57
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0149
AC XY:
1109
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0530
AC:
2203
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00516
AC:
79
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10590
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000235
AC:
16
AN:
67988
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0156
AC:
33
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
119
237
356
474
593
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0174
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00434
AC:
15
AN:
3466

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Feb 08, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 14, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leigh syndrome Benign:2
Sep 09, 2022
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5 Benign:1
Feb 27, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Dec 09, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
0.57
DANN
Benign
0.33
PhyloP100
-1.0
PromoterAI
0.011
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=300/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs377134185; hg19: chr5-218467; API