5-218354-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):​c.-2A>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000308 in 1,458,956 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.693
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 5-218354-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-218354-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 486359.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Benign=1, Likely_benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkc.-2A>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 15 ENST00000264932.11 NP_004159.2 P31040-1A0A024QZ30

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932 linkc.-2A>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 15 1 NM_004168.4 ENSP00000264932.6 P31040-1
ENSG00000286001ENST00000651543.1 linkn.-2A>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 24 ENSP00000499215.1 A0A494C1T6
ENSG00000286001ENST00000651543.1 linkn.-2A>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 24 ENSP00000499215.1 A0A494C1T6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000145
AC:
22
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000530
AC:
6
AN:
113216
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000610
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
65608
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000807
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000174
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000176
AC:
23
AN:
1306814
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000186
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
645024
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000708
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000151
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000561
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000145
AC:
22
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74318
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000479
Bravo
AF:
0.000125

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Dec 22, 2022
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 03, 2024
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Leigh syndrome Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Nov 28, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.-2A>T variant is located in the 5' untranslated region (5’ UTR) of the SDHA gene. This variant results from an A to T substitution 2 bases upstream from the first translated codon. This nucleotide position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
4.1
DANN
Benign
0.53
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs763680697; hg19: chr5-218469; API