5-230996-T-C

Position:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):ā€‹c.891T>Cā€‹(p.Pro297=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.742 in 1,613,450 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 449,173 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.74 ( 42249 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.74 ( 406924 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.31
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 5-230996-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-230996-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130283.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-230996-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.31 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.775 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.891T>C p.Pro297= synonymous_variant 7/15 ENST00000264932.11 NP_004159.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.891T>C p.Pro297= synonymous_variant 7/151 NM_004168.4 ENSP00000264932 P1P31040-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.740
AC:
112600
AN:
152064
Hom.:
42215
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.782
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.831
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.710
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.704
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.336
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.673
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.751
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.608
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.758
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.737
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.700
AC:
175528
AN:
250646
Hom.:
63289
AF XY:
0.703
AC XY:
95344
AN XY:
135556
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.786
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.655
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.699
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.320
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.681
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.758
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.757
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.711
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.742
AC:
1084235
AN:
1461266
Hom.:
406924
Cov.:
53
AF XY:
0.740
AC XY:
537674
AN XY:
726970
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.784
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.659
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.696
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.348
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.683
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.762
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.764
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.722
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.741
AC:
112696
AN:
152184
Hom.:
42249
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.737
AC XY:
54854
AN XY:
74386
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.782
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.709
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.704
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.336
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.674
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.751
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.758
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.734
Alfa
AF:
0.754
Hom.:
18654
Bravo
AF:
0.735
Asia WGS
AF:
0.523
AC:
1820
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.752
EpiControl
AF:
0.747

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesFeb 09, 2021- -
Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1GG Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Neurodegeneration with ataxia and late-onset optic atrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Paragangliomas 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
9.8
DANN
Benign
0.37

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1126417; hg19: chr5-231111; COSMIC: COSV53767683; COSMIC: COSV53767683; API