Menu
GeneBe

5-233550-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):c.969C>T(p.Gly323=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00683 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 87 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G323G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0045 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0071 ( 83 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.74
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 5-233550-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-233550-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 141242.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=12, Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr5-233550-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr5-233550-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.74 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00453 (690/152224) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0193 (93/4814). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0161. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 328 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.969C>T p.Gly323= synonymous_variant 8/15 ENST00000264932.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.969C>T p.Gly323= synonymous_variant 8/151 NM_004168.4 P1P31040-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00456
AC:
694
AN:
152106
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0195
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000755
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00579
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00908
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00724
AC:
1821
AN:
251496
Hom.:
23
AF XY:
0.00850
AC XY:
1156
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000861
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00223
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0237
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00607
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00896
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00707
AC:
10329
AN:
1461842
Hom.:
83
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00760
AC XY:
5524
AN XY:
727216
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0246
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00690
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00453
AC:
690
AN:
152224
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00441
AC XY:
328
AN XY:
74422
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000755
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00579
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00851
Alfa
AF:
0.00545
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00435
EpiCase
AF:
0.00774
EpiControl
AF:
0.00717

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 17, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMar 30, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 08, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The SDHA p.Gly275Gly variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB or LOVD 3.0 databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs142849100) as "With Likely benign allele". The variant was identified in ClinVar, classified as benign and likely benign. There are 7 submissions for this variant in ClinVar: 3 submissions of benign (Ambry Genetics, Invitae, and Prevention Genetics) and 4 submissions of likely benign (3 from Illumina and 1 from GeneDx). The variant was also identified in Clinvitae with one submission from Invitae of likely benign. The variant was identified in control databases in 1956 of 282892 chromosomes (23 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.006914 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 246 of 10370 chromosomes (freq: 0.02372), South Asian in 706 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.02306), Other in 68 of 7228 chromosomes (freq: 0.009408), European (non-Finnish) in 782 of 129192 chromosomes (freq: 0.006053), Latino in 82 of 35440 chromosomes (freq: 0.002314), European (Finnish) in 44 of 25122 chromosomes (freq: 0.001751), African in 27 of 24970 chromosomes (freq: 0.001081) and East Asian in 1 of 19954 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005). The p.(Gly275Gly) variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site, however 4 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing and the creation of a new 5' splice site. Computational evidence is only available from MutationTaster, and the variant is predicted to be disease causing. The Gly275 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024SDHA: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 01, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 21, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 27, 2020- -
Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Paragangliomas 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
Cadd
Benign
8.3
Dann
Benign
0.87

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142849100; hg19: chr5-233665; COSMIC: COSV53772676; COSMIC: COSV53772676; API