5-256399-G-C

Position:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):ā€‹c.1974G>Cā€‹(p.Pro658Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0021 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0036 ( 1 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.12
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 5-256399-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-256399-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 252907.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-256399-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.12 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1974G>C p.Pro658Pro synonymous_variant 15/15 ENST00000264932.11 NP_004159.2 P31040-1A0A024QZ30

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1974G>C p.Pro658Pro synonymous_variant 15/151 NM_004168.4 ENSP00000264932.6 P31040-1
ENSG00000286001ENST00000651543.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*707G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 14/24 ENSP00000499215.1 A0A494C1T6
ENSG00000286001ENST00000651543.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*707G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 14/24 ENSP00000499215.1 A0A494C1T6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00207
AC:
293
AN:
141744
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00341
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000914
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00258
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00645
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00362
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
0.00360
AC:
4311
AN:
1198342
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00325
AC XY:
1955
AN XY:
601432
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00484
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00295
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000834
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00134
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00414
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00317
GnomAD4 genome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
0.00207
AC:
293
AN:
141854
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00224
AC XY:
154
AN XY:
68834
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00340
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000914
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00258
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00358
Alfa
AF:
0.00206
Hom.:
0

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMay 27, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2023SDHA: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 23, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 20, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 12, 2021- -
Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
SDHA-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 30, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.41

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1042446; hg19: chr5-256514; COSMIC: COSV53765147; COSMIC: COSV53765147; API