5-36671168-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_004172.5(SLC1A3):c.459A>T(p.Glu153Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000607 in 1,613,866 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004172.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC1A3 | NM_004172.5 | c.459A>T | p.Glu153Asp | missense_variant | 4/10 | ENST00000265113.9 | NP_004163.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC1A3 | ENST00000265113.9 | c.459A>T | p.Glu153Asp | missense_variant | 4/10 | 1 | NM_004172.5 | ENSP00000265113.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251174Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135748
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000650 AC: 95AN: 1461678Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000619 AC XY: 45AN XY: 727146
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74344
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 17, 2023 | Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) Computational tools predict that this variant is not damaging. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at