5-36985245-A-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):c.2065A>T(p.Asn689Tyr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000384 in 1,613,672 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000040 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NIPBL
NM_133433.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.79

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NIPBL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Cornelia de Lange syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P

NIPBL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.35235864).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000263 (4/152076) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0000588 (4/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000197. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 2 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 58 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_133433.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
NIPBL	NM_133433.4	MANE Select	c.2065A>T	p.Asn689Tyr	missense	Exon 10 of 47	NP_597677.2
NIPBL	NM_001438586.1		c.2065A>T	p.Asn689Tyr	missense	Exon 10 of 47	NP_001425515.1
NIPBL	NM_015384.5		c.2065A>T	p.Asn689Tyr	missense	Exon 10 of 46	NP_056199.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
NIPBL	ENST00000282516.13	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.2065A>T	p.Asn689Tyr	missense	Exon 10 of 47	ENSP00000282516.8
NIPBL	ENST00000448238.2	TSL:1	c.2065A>T	p.Asn689Tyr	missense	Exon 10 of 46	ENSP00000406266.2
NIPBL	ENST00000652901.1		c.2065A>T	p.Asn689Tyr	missense	Exon 10 of 46	ENSP00000499536.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152076

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000120

AC:

AN:

249690

AF XY:

0.0000148

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000178

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000397

AC:

AN:

1461596

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000330

AC XY:

AN XY:

727094

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33464

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44620

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26124

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53326

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000477

AC:

AN:

1111948

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000662

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152076

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74282

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41414

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15248

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10606

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

68004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.425

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000253

Hom.:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1

Uncertain:4

Apr 26, 2023

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 689 of the NIPBL protein (p.Asn689Tyr). This variant is present in population databases (rs201482152, gnomAD 0.003%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with NIPBL-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 159044). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on NIPBL protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.14

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.072

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.030

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.97

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.19

Eigen

Uncertain

0.23

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.38

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Benign

0.80

M_CAP

Benign

0.042

MetaRNN

Benign

0.35

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.46

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.0

PhyloP100

4.8

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.65

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.83

REVEL

Uncertain

0.37

Sift

Uncertain

0.0020

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0090

Polyphen

0.68

Vest4

0.61

MutPred

0.20

Gain of phosphorylation at N689 (P = 0.014)

MVP

0.68

MPC

0.40

ClinPred

0.21

GERP RS

6.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.20

gMVP

0.45

Mutation Taster

=89/11

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over