5-36985649-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):ā€‹c.2469A>Gā€‹(p.Lys823=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00602 in 1,613,946 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 516 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.033 ( 259 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0033 ( 257 hom. )

Consequence

NIPBL
NM_133433.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.83
Variant links:
Genes affected
NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 5-36985649-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-36985649-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 96335.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.83 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.11 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NIPBLNM_133433.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2469A>G p.Lys823= synonymous_variant 10/47 ENST00000282516.13 NP_597677.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NIPBLENST00000282516.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.2469A>G p.Lys823= synonymous_variant 10/471 NM_133433.4 ENSP00000282516 P1Q6KC79-1
NIPBLENST00000448238.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2469A>G p.Lys823= synonymous_variant 10/461 ENSP00000406266 Q6KC79-2
NIPBLENST00000652901.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2469A>G p.Lys823= synonymous_variant 10/46 ENSP00000499536
NIPBLENST00000504430.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.2089A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 6/82

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0325
AC:
4949
AN:
152128
Hom.:
258
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.113
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0244
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00853
AC:
2137
AN:
250506
Hom.:
131
AF XY:
0.00609
AC XY:
824
AN XY:
135396
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00549
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000796
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00229
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00325
AC:
4754
AN:
1461700
Hom.:
257
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00269
AC XY:
1957
AN XY:
727154
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00643
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000243
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000540
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00685
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0326
AC:
4957
AN:
152246
Hom.:
259
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0314
AC XY:
2336
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.113
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0241
Alfa
AF:
0.0126
Hom.:
75
Bravo
AF:
0.0381
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00520
AC:
18
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 28, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 04, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 16, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
6.1
DANN
Benign
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs293756; hg19: chr5-36985751; API