5-37036347-GTATATATATATA-GTATATATATATATA

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):​c.5863-12_5863-11dupAT variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0079 ( 6 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.026 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NIPBL
NM_133433.4 intron

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0120

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NIPBL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Cornelia de Lange syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 5-37036347-G-GTA is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37036347-G-GTA is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 96347.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00793 (1079/135980) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0175 (75/4284). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0143. There are 6 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 498 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 0. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1079 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NIPBLNM_133433.4 linkc.5863-12_5863-11dupAT intron_variant Intron 32 of 46 ENST00000282516.13 NP_597677.2 Q6KC79-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NIPBLENST00000282516.13 linkc.5863-32_5863-31insTA intron_variant Intron 32 of 46 1 NM_133433.4 ENSP00000282516.8 Q6KC79-1
NIPBLENST00000448238.2 linkc.5863-32_5863-31insTA intron_variant Intron 32 of 45 1 ENSP00000406266.2 Q6KC79-2
NIPBLENST00000652901.1 linkc.5863-32_5863-31insTA intron_variant Intron 32 of 45 ENSP00000499536.1 A0A590UJS4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00793
AC:
1079
AN:
135986
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
0
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00579
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00390
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00302
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00345
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00655
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00655
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0307
AC:
1011
AN:
32888
AF XY:
0.0341
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00654
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0192
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0238
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0288
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0359
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0235
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0263
AC:
6378
AN:
242628
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.0278
AC XY:
3686
AN XY:
132528
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0183
AC:
79
AN:
4322
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0171
AC:
88
AN:
5140
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0226
AC:
148
AN:
6546
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0270
AC:
259
AN:
9578
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0369
AC:
372
AN:
10074
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
275
AN:
20022
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0164
AC:
14
AN:
854
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0277
AC:
4851
AN:
175286
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0270
AC:
292
AN:
10806
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.305
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
480
961
1441
1922
2402
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
114
228
342
456
570
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00793
AC:
1079
AN:
135980
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00763
AC XY:
498
AN XY:
65258
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
414
AN:
36828
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00390
AC:
52
AN:
13334
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00302
AC:
10
AN:
3312
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0169
AC:
80
AN:
4724
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0175
AC:
75
AN:
4284
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00179
AC:
12
AN:
6686
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00370
AC:
1
AN:
270
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00655
AC:
418
AN:
63834
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00651
AC:
12
AN:
1844
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
49
98
147
196
245
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00366
Hom.:
457

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1
Jul 15, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Sep 19, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
0.012
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10554564; hg19: chr5-37036449; API