5-37153938-T-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001384732.1(CPLANE1):c.8175A>C(p.Ala2725Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00028 in 1,614,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CPLANE1
NM_001384732.1 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.16

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CPLANE1 (HGNC:25801): (ciliogenesis and planar polarity effector complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene has putative coiled-coil domains and may be a transmembrane protein. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome (JBTS). [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

CPLANE1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Joubert syndrome 17
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, ClinGen, G2P, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P
Joubert syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CPLANE1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).

BP6

Variant 5-37153938-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37153938-T-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 261676.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.16 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000394 (60/152328) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00137 (21/15304). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000919. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 29 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CPLANE1	NM_001384732.1 link	c.8175A>C	p.Ala2725Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 42 of 53	ENST00000651892.2	NP_001371661.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CPLANE1	ENST00000651892.2 link	c.8175A>C	p.Ala2725Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 42 of 53		NM_001384732.1	ENSP00000498265.2		A0A494BZW6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000394

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00137

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00605

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000485

AC:

122

AN:

251354

AF XY:

0.000464

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000782

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00575

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000220

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000268

AC:

392

AN:

1461804

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000241

AC XY:

175

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000149

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000694

AC:

AN:

44698

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00524

AC:

137

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000696

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00919

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000971

AC:

108

AN:

1111970

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000844

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

119

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000394

AC:

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000389

AC XY:

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000722

AC:

AN:

41574

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00137

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00605

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.504

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000477

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000495

EpiCase

AF:

0.000491

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 16, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 20, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Joubert syndrome 17

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.87

CADD

Benign

0.40

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.25

PhyloP100

-1.2

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over