5-37226786-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001384732.1(CPLANE1):āc.1809T>Cā(p.Thr603=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00321 in 1,543,388 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 147 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.017 ( 82 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0017 ( 65 hom. )
Consequence
CPLANE1
NM_001384732.1 synonymous
NM_001384732.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.09
Genes affected
CPLANE1 (HGNC:25801): (ciliogenesis and planar polarity effector complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene has putative coiled-coil domains and may be a transmembrane protein. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome (JBTS). [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 5-37226786-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37226786-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 158028.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.09 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0592 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLANE1 | NM_001384732.1 | c.1809T>C | p.Thr603= | synonymous_variant | 12/53 | ENST00000651892.2 | NP_001371661.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLANE1 | ENST00000651892.2 | c.1809T>C | p.Thr603= | synonymous_variant | 12/53 | NM_001384732.1 | ENSP00000498265 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0173 AC: 2631AN: 152206Hom.: 81 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2631
AN:
152206
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00377 AC: 562AN: 149140Hom.: 17 AF XY: 0.00300 AC XY: 236AN XY: 78770
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
562
AN:
149140
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
236
AN XY:
78770
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00166 AC: 2316AN: 1391064Hom.: 65 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00151 AC XY: 1032AN XY: 685640
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2316
AN:
1391064
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1032
AN XY:
685640
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0174 AC: 2644AN: 152324Hom.: 82 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0167 AC XY: 1243AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2644
AN:
152324
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1243
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 12, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 13, 2023 | Variant summary: CPLANE1 c.1809T>C results in a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0032 in 1543388 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 147 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 2.17 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CPLANE1 causing Joubert Syndrome And Related Disorders phenotype (0.0015), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Four submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Orofaciodigital syndrome type 6;C3553264:Joubert syndrome 17 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Sep 01, 2021 | - - |
Joubert syndrome 17 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at