5-69419500-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_001038603.3(MARVELD2):c.115C>T(p.Arg39Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000384 in 1,613,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001038603.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000835 AC: 21AN: 251418Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.0000883 AC XY: 12AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000363 AC: 53AN: 1461664Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000358 AC XY: 26AN XY: 727136
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152278Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 49 Uncertain:1
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
The p.Arg39Trp variant in MARVELD2 has not been previously reported in individua ls with hearing loss, but it has been identified in 2/10400 African chromosomes and in 3/66714 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, h ttp://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs145027254). Although this variant has bee n seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses sugge st that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significan ce of the p.Arg39Trp variant is uncertain. -
not provided Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at