5-90683668-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):c.5747C>T(p.Thr1916Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00195 in 1,613,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 57 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 29 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 28 hom. )
Consequence
ADGRV1
NM_032119.4 missense
NM_032119.4 missense
Scores
6
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.93
Genes affected
ADGRV1 (HGNC:17416): (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor V1) This gene encodes a member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. The encoded protein contains a 7-transmembrane receptor domain, binds calcium and is expressed in the central nervous system. Mutations in this gene are associated with Usher syndrome 2 and familial febrile seizures. Several alternatively spliced transcripts have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0055490136).
BP6
Variant 5-90683668-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-90683668-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 158653.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-90683668-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0105 (1599/152216) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0365 (1517/41528). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.035. There are 29 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 746 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 29 AR,Digenic gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | NM_032119.4 | c.5747C>T | p.Thr1916Ile | missense_variant | 28/90 | ENST00000405460.9 | NP_115495.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | ENST00000405460.9 | c.5747C>T | p.Thr1916Ile | missense_variant | 28/90 | 1 | NM_032119.4 | ENSP00000384582.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0104 AC: 1588AN: 152098Hom.: 28 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1588
AN:
152098
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00274 AC: 683AN: 248820Hom.: 16 AF XY: 0.00215 AC XY: 290AN XY: 134988
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
683
AN:
248820
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
290
AN XY:
134988
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00106 AC: 1554AN: 1461546Hom.: 28 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000930 AC XY: 676AN XY: 727040
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1554
AN:
1461546
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
676
AN XY:
727040
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0105 AC: 1599AN: 152216Hom.: 29 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0100 AC XY: 746AN XY: 74430
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1599
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
746
AN XY:
74430
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
149
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
AC:
418
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 23, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Thr1916Ile in Exon 28 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 3.7% (120/3216) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs35791889). - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 24, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jun 04, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 2C Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
.;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
.;D;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
.;D;.
Sift4G
Benign
.;T;.
Polyphen
D;D;.
Vest4
0.27
MVP
0.74
MPC
0.32
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at