5-90694040-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):āc.7284T>Cā(p.Asn2428=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000442 in 1,613,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0023 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
ADGRV1
NM_032119.4 synonymous
NM_032119.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.51
Genes affected
ADGRV1 (HGNC:17416): (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor V1) This gene encodes a member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. The encoded protein contains a 7-transmembrane receptor domain, binds calcium and is expressed in the central nervous system. Mutations in this gene are associated with Usher syndrome 2 and familial febrile seizures. Several alternatively spliced transcripts have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 5-90694040-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-90694040-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46367.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.51 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00228 (347/152310) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00813 (338/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00742. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 161 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR,Digenic gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | NM_032119.4 | c.7284T>C | p.Asn2428= | synonymous_variant | 33/90 | ENST00000405460.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | ENST00000405460.9 | c.7284T>C | p.Asn2428= | synonymous_variant | 33/90 | 1 | NM_032119.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00226 AC: 344AN: 152192Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
344
AN:
152192
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000591 AC: 147AN: 248722Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000474 AC XY: 64AN XY: 134944
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
147
AN:
248722
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
134944
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000250 AC: 366AN: 1461488Hom.: 2 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.000235 AC XY: 171AN XY: 727008
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
366
AN:
1461488
Hom.:
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
AC XY:
171
AN XY:
727008
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00228 AC: 347AN: 152310Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00216 AC XY: 161AN XY: 74464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
347
AN:
152310
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
74464
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 23, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 24, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 13, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 14, 2012 | Asn2428Asn in Exon 33 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.6% (20/3140) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs148932387). - |
Usher syndrome type 2C Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at