5-90756555-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):c.11682C>T(p.Pro3894Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.466 in 1,610,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 178,559 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032119.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.520 AC: 78972AN: 151736Hom.: 21360 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.487 AC: 121081AN: 248730Hom.: 30949 AF XY: 0.474 AC XY: 63913AN XY: 134906
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.460 AC: 670601AN: 1458184Hom.: 157159 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.456 AC XY: 330690AN XY: 725490
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.521 AC: 79070AN: 151854Hom.: 21400 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.521 AC XY: 38671AN XY: 74188
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Usher syndrome type 2C Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at