5-90810868-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):āc.15608A>Gā(p.Glu5203Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000426 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032119.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000414 AC: 63AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00104 AC: 259AN: 249204Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000888 AC XY: 120AN XY: 135182
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000428 AC: 625AN: 1461712Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000411 AC XY: 299AN XY: 727138
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000414 AC: 63AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000430 AC XY: 32AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
The ADGRV1 p.Glu5203Gly variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs202106463) and in ClinVar (classified as a VUS by EGL Genetic Diagnostics and as benign by Laboratory for Molecular Medicine). The variant was identified in control databases in 265 of 280608 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.000944 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 32 of 7142 chromosomes (freq: 0.004481), Ashkenazi Jewish in 45 of 10352 chromosomes (freq: 0.004347), Latino in 140 of 35374 chromosomes (freq: 0.003958), European (non-Finnish) in 41 of 128386 chromosomes (freq: 0.000319), South Asian in 6 of 30602 chromosomes (freq: 0.000196) and African in 1 of 24192 chromosomes (freq: 0.000041); it was not observed in the East Asian or European (Finnish) populations. The p.Glu5203Gly residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
ADGRV1: BP1, BP4, BS1 -
not specified Benign:2
Glu5203Gly in exon 74 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.7% (85/11574) of Latino chromosom es, including 3 homozygotes, by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://e xac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs202106463). -
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.15608A>G (p.E5203G) alteration is located in exon 74 (coding exon 74) of the ADGRV1 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 15608, causing the glutamic acid (E) at amino acid position 5203 to be replaced by a glycine (G). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Usher syndrome type 2C Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at