5-96783148-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_001040458.3(ERAP1):c.2188C>G(p.Gln730Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.715 in 1,613,816 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 413,964 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely benign in UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001040458.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERAP1 | ENST00000443439.7 | c.2188C>G | p.Gln730Glu | missense_variant | Exon 15 of 19 | 1 | NM_001040458.3 | ENSP00000406304.2 | ||
ERAP1 | ENST00000296754.7 | c.2188C>G | p.Gln730Glu | missense_variant | Exon 15 of 20 | 1 | ENSP00000296754.3 | |||
ERAP1 | ENST00000514604.5 | n.612C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 5 of 6 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.703 AC: 106882AN: 151950Hom.: 37831 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.692 AC: 173885AN: 251392Hom.: 60690 AF XY: 0.696 AC XY: 94517AN XY: 135858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.716 AC: 1046529AN: 1461746Hom.: 376086 Cov.: 53 AF XY: 0.717 AC XY: 521283AN XY: 727176
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.704 AC: 106982AN: 152070Hom.: 37878 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.701 AC XY: 52097AN XY: 74336
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 88% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 77. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at