5-96903554-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_022350.5(ERAP2):c.2006T>C(p.Leu669Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000693 in 1,442,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022350.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022350.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERAP2 | NM_022350.5 | MANE Select | c.2006T>C | p.Leu669Pro | missense | Exon 13 of 19 | NP_071745.1 | ||
| ERAP2 | NM_001130140.3 | c.2006T>C | p.Leu669Pro | missense | Exon 13 of 19 | NP_001123612.1 | |||
| ERAP2 | NM_001437802.1 | c.1937T>C | p.Leu646Pro | missense | Exon 12 of 18 | NP_001424731.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERAP2 | ENST00000437043.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2006T>C | p.Leu669Pro | missense | Exon 13 of 19 | ENSP00000400376.3 | ||
| ERAP2 | ENST00000379904.8 | TSL:1 | c.1871T>C | p.Leu624Pro | missense | Exon 12 of 18 | ENSP00000369235.4 | ||
| ERAP2 | ENST00000510373.6 | TSL:2 | c.2006T>C | p.Leu669Pro | missense | Exon 13 of 19 | ENSP00000421175.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.93e-7 AC: 1AN: 1442858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 716584 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at