6-10528886-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_145649.5(GCNT2):c.-26A>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0739 in 1,539,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,049 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145649.5 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cataract 13 with adult I phenotypeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- total early-onset cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_145649.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCNT2 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.-26A>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000419411.2 | Q8N0V5-1 | |||
| GCNT2 | TSL:1 | c.-26A>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000368917.3 | Q8N0V5-1 | |||
| GCNT2 | TSL:1 | c.67+19728A>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000386321.1 | B7ZBL3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0573 AC: 8724AN: 152140Hom.: 370 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0582 AC: 14605AN: 251022 AF XY: 0.0594 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0757 AC: 105007AN: 1387108Hom.: 4679 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0747 AC XY: 51891AN XY: 694592 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0573 AC: 8719AN: 152258Hom.: 370 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0536 AC XY: 3988AN XY: 74444 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at