6-109760354-T-C

Position:

chr6-109760354-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_014845.6(FIG4):c.1242T>C(p.Ile414=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00169 in 1,613,216 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0082 ( 26 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

FIG4
NM_014845.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0560

Variant links:

Genes affected

FIG4 (HGNC:16873): (FIG4 phosphoinositide 5-phosphatase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the SAC domain-containing protein gene family. The SAC domain, approximately 400 amino acids in length and consisting of seven conserved motifs, has been shown to possess phosphoinositide phosphatase activity. The yeast homolog, Sac1p, is involved in the regulation of various phosphoinositides, and affects diverse cellular functions such as actin cytoskeleton organization, Golgi function, and maintenance of vacuole morphology. Membrane-bound phosphoinositides function as signaling molecules and play a key role in vesicle trafficking in eukaryotic cells. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 4J. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FIG4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 6-109760354-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-109760354-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 355038.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.056 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00822 (1252/152298) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0268 (1112/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0255. There are 26 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 630 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 26 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FIG4	NM_014845.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1242T>C	p.Ile414=	synonymous_variant	11/23	ENST00000230124.8	NP_055660.1
FIG4	XM_011536281.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1179T>C	p.Ile393=	synonymous_variant	11/23		XP_011534583.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FIG4	ENST00000230124.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.1242T>C	p.Ile414=	synonymous_variant	11/23	1	NM_014845.6	ENSP00000230124	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00817

AC:

1243

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0266

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00582

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0115

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00216

AC:

543

AN:

251390

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00165

AC XY:

224

AN XY:

135874

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0242

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00243

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000496

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000343

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00228

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00101

AC:

1472

AN:

1460918

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000886

AC XY:

644

AN XY:

726864

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0271

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000928

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000374

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000216

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00277

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00822

AC:

1252

AN:

152298

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00846

AC XY:

630

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0268

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00582

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0114

Alfa

AF:

0.00379

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00939

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00520

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00104

EpiControl

AF:

0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Jul 27, 2020	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Sep 29, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Mar 03, 2022

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 11

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4J

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

Yunis-Varon syndrome;C1970011:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4J;C2675491:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 11;C4013648:Bilateral parasagittal parieto-occipital polymicrogyria

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Aug 06, 2021

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 31, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

7.1

DANN

Benign

0.80

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over