6-109792671-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_014845.6(FIG4):c.2459+7T>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000117 in 1,456,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014845.6 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Illumina
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4JInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- Yunis-Varon syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 11Inheritance: Unknown, AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- bilateral parasagittal parieto-occipital polymicrogyriaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIG4 | ENST00000230124.8 | c.2459+7T>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 21 of 22 | 1 | NM_014845.6 | ENSP00000230124.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000790 AC: 12AN: 151828Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000519 AC: 13AN: 250460 AF XY: 0.0000517 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000122 AC: 159AN: 1304970Hom.: 0 Cov.: 20 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 82AN XY: 658276 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000790 AC: 12AN: 151828Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000944 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74144 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Variant summary: FIG4 c.2459+7T>G alters a nucleotide located at a position not widely known to affect splicing. Consensus agreement among computation tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 5.2e-05 in 250460 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in FIG4 causing Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4J (5.2e-05 vs 0.0011), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2459+7T>G in individuals affected with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4J and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 447335). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
FIG4-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at