6-109825083-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_014845.6(FIG4):c.2547-5T>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000622 in 1,613,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014845.6 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIG4 | NM_014845.6 | c.2547-5T>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000230124.8 | NP_055660.1 | |||
FIG4 | XM_011536281.4 | c.2484-5T>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | XP_011534583.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIG4 | ENST00000230124.8 | c.2547-5T>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_014845.6 | ENSP00000230124.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000351 AC: 88AN: 250534Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 51AN XY: 135498
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000651 AC: 951AN: 1460734Hom.: 1 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000607 AC XY: 441AN XY: 726814
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152358Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000322 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74514
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 18, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 20, 2019 | The FIG4 c.2547-5T>G variant (rs200267243), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 355047). This variant is found in the general population with an allele frequency of 0.034% (97/281,940 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. This is an intronic variant in a weakly conserved nucleotide, but computational analyses (Alamut v.2.11) predict that this variant may impact splicing by weakening the nearby canonical acceptor splice site. However, given the lack of clinical and functional data, the significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2024 | FIG4: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 18, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32376792) - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 24, 2022 | The c.2547-5T>G intronic variant results from a T to G substitution 5 nucleotides upstream from coding exon 23 in the FIG4 gene. This nucleotide position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will not have any significant effect on splicing. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4J Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 06, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at