6-116877337-C-A

Position:

chr6-116877337-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_173560.4(RFX6):c.62C>A(p.Ser21Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000665 in 1,612,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00054 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00068 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RFX6
NM_173560.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.725

Variant links:

Genes affected

RFX6 (HGNC:21478): (regulatory factor X6) The nuclear protein encoded by this gene is a member of the regulatory factor X (RFX) family of transcription factors. Studies in mice suggest that this gene is specifically required for the differentiation of islet cells for the production of insulin, but not for the differentiation of pancreatic polypeptide-producing cells. It regulates the transcription factors involved in beta-cell maturation and function, thus, restricting the expression of the beta-cell differentiation and specification genes. Mutations in this gene are associated with Mitchell-Riley syndrome, which is characterized by neonatal diabetes with pancreatic hypoplasia, duodenal and jejunal atresia, and gall bladder agenesis.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2010]

RFX6 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018052548).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000545 (83/152318) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000985 (67/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000795. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 35 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RFX6	NM_173560.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.62C>A	p.Ser21Tyr	missense_variant	1/19	ENST00000332958.3	NP_775831.2
RFX6	XM_011535589.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.62C>A	p.Ser21Tyr	missense_variant	1/18		XP_011533891.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RFX6	ENST00000332958.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.62C>A	p.Ser21Tyr	missense_variant	1/19	1	NM_173560.4	ENSP00000332208	P1
RFX6	ENST00000487683.5 linkuse as main transcript	n.126C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	1/14	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000545

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000985

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000582

AC:

143

AN:

245622

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000583

AC XY:

AN XY:

133748

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000875

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000706

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000232

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00107

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000669

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000677

AC:

989

AN:

1460554

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000702

AC XY:

510

AN XY:

726498

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000598

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000896

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000843

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000163

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000376

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000823

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000481

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000545

AC:

AN:

152318

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000470

AC XY:

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000985

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Alfa

AF:

0.000998

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000570

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000681

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000814

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000626

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Oct 05, 2022	This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 21 of the RFX6 protein (p.Ser21Tyr). This variant is present in population databases (rs146773792, gnomAD 0.1%), including at least one homozygous and/or hemizygous individual. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RFX6-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 917470). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Apr 03, 2023	In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Monogenic diabetes

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Jul 27, 2018

ACMG criteria: BP4 (REVEL score 0.081 + BP4 (9 predictors); not using PP3 (2 predictors)) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.094

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.46

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.48

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.96

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.083

Eigen

Benign

-0.16

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.22

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.27

LIST_S2

Benign

0.53

M_CAP

Benign

0.024

MetaRNN

Benign

0.018

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.0

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.43

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.31

REVEL

Benign

0.081

Sift

Uncertain

0.0090

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

Polyphen

0.91

Vest4

0.39

MVP

0.34

MPC

0.99

ClinPred

0.025

GERP RS

5.3

Varity_R

0.094

gMVP

0.39

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over