6-121321644-T-C
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7BA1
The NM_152730.6(TBC1D32):c.306A>G(p.Gln102Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0259 in 1,612,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,876 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.052 ( 400 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 1476 hom. )
Consequence
TBC1D32
NM_152730.6 synonymous
NM_152730.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0270
Publications
6 publications found
Genes affected
TBC1D32 (HGNC:21485): (TBC1 domain family member 32) This gene encodes a TBC-domain containing protein. Studies of a similar protein in mouse and zebrafish suggest that the encoded protein is involved in sonic hedgehog signaling, and that it interacts with and stabilizes cell cycle-related kinase. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
TBC1D32 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- ciliopathyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Illumina, G2P
- orofaciodigital syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
- orofaciodigital syndrome IXInheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 6-121321644-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-121321644-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 1560549.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.027 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.109 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBC1D32 | ENST00000398212.7 | c.306A>G | p.Gln102Gln | synonymous_variant | Exon 2 of 32 | 5 | NM_152730.6 | ENSP00000381270.2 | ||
| TBC1D32 | ENST00000275159.11 | c.306A>G | p.Gln102Gln | synonymous_variant | Exon 2 of 33 | 5 | ENSP00000275159.6 | |||
| TBC1D32 | ENST00000464622.5 | n.306A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 36 | 2 | ENSP00000428839.1 | ||||
| TBC1D32 | ENST00000422369.1 | c.306A>G | p.Gln102Gln | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | 3 | ENSP00000397993.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0515 AC: 7839AN: 152114Hom.: 400 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7839
AN:
152114
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0491 AC: 12170AN: 247982 AF XY: 0.0404 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
12170
AN:
247982
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0232 AC: 33873AN: 1460494Hom.: 1476 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0215 AC XY: 15638AN XY: 726518 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
33873
AN:
1460494
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
15638
AN XY:
726518
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
3343
AN:
33292
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
7078
AN:
44508
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
265
AN:
26090
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
5708
AN:
39664
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
846
AN:
85928
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
1549
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
51
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
13419
AN:
1111502
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1614
AN:
60346
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1528
3056
4585
6113
7641
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
674
1348
2022
2696
3370
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0516 AC: 7850AN: 152232Hom.: 400 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0528 AC XY: 3928AN XY: 74422 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7850
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3928
AN XY:
74422
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
4187
AN:
41538
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1645
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
603
AN:
5154
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
60
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
309
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
901
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
105
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
352
704
1055
1407
1759
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
80
160
240
320
400
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
306
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Jan 24, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.