6-121447452-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_000165.5(GJA1):c.605G>A(p.Arg202His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000165.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA1 | NM_000165.5 | c.605G>A | p.Arg202His | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000282561.4 | NP_000156.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA1 | ENST00000282561.4 | c.605G>A | p.Arg202His | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_000165.5 | ENSP00000282561 | P1 | |
GJA1 | ENST00000647564.1 | c.605G>A | p.Arg202His | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENSP00000497565 | P1 | |||
GJA1 | ENST00000649003.1 | c.605G>A | p.Arg202His | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENSP00000497283 | P1 | |||
GJA1 | ENST00000650427.1 | c.605G>A | p.Arg202His | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENSP00000497367 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461842Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 24, 2024 | Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect (PMID: 15879313); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 14729836, 15637728, 24434540, 16531323, 12457340, 18946008, 19338053, 24133447, 16891658, 18831677, 30638447, 33584802, 34630166, 32318302, 15879313) - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Oculodentodigital dysplasia Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Duke University Health System Sequencing Clinic, Duke University Health System | Apr 20, 2023 | - - |
Oculodentodigital dysplasia, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 30, 2020 | This sequence change replaces arginine with histidine at codon 202 of the GJA1 protein (p.Arg202His). The arginine residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between arginine and histidine. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change leads to intracellular retention, reduced gap junction plaque formation and impaired coupling (PMID: 15879313, 16531323). This variant has been reported in several individuals affected with oculodentodigital dysplasia (PMID: 12457340, 18946008). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 372744). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the ExAC database. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at