6-129516232-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_000426.4(LAMA2):c.9254G>A(p.Arg3085Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000341 in 1,613,856 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000426.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA2 | NM_000426.4 | c.9254G>A | p.Arg3085Gln | missense_variant | 65/65 | ENST00000421865.3 | NP_000417.3 | |
LOC102723409 | XR_001743860.2 | n.12102+6245C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA2 | ENST00000421865.3 | c.9254G>A | p.Arg3085Gln | missense_variant | 65/65 | 5 | NM_000426.4 | ENSP00000400365 | ||
ENST00000665046.1 | n.788+6245C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000398 AC: 10AN: 251280Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000442 AC XY: 6AN XY: 135790
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000335 AC: 49AN: 1461842Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000358 AC XY: 26AN XY: 727220
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74242
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 06, 2016 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 31, 2021 | The c.9254G>A (p.R3085Q) alteration is located in exon 65 (coding exon 65) of the LAMA2 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 9254, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 3085 to be replaced by a glutamine (Q). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Aug 09, 2022 | - - |
Congenital muscular dystrophy due to partial LAMA2 deficiency Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at