6-133274782-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PVS1_ModerateBS2
The NM_004100.5(EYA4):c.2T>C(p.Met1?) variant causes a start lost change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000744 in 1,613,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004100.5 start_lost
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 10Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- dilated cardiomyopathy 1JInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004100.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EYA4 | NM_004100.5 | MANE Select | c.2T>C | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 2 of 20 | NP_004091.3 | ||
| EYA4 | NM_001301013.2 | c.2T>C | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 2 of 20 | NP_001287942.1 | |||
| EYA4 | NM_172105.4 | c.2T>C | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 2 of 20 | NP_742103.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EYA4 | ENST00000355286.12 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2T>C | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 2 of 20 | ENSP00000347434.7 | ||
| EYA4 | ENST00000531901.5 | TSL:2 | c.2T>C | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 2 of 20 | ENSP00000432770.1 | ||
| EYA4 | ENST00000431403.3 | TSL:5 | c.2T>C | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 2 of 19 | ENSP00000404558.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251230 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000684 AC: 10AN: 1461428Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727046 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74466 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1J Uncertain:1
This sequence change affects the initiator methionine of the EYA4 mRNA. The next in-frame methionine is located at codon 30. This variant is present in population databases (rs200593099, gnomAD 0.007%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with EYA4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 191657). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
not provided Uncertain:1
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.M1? variant (also known as c.2T>C) is located in coding exon 1 of the EYA4 gene and results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 2. This alters the methionine residue at the initiation codon (ATG). Variations that modify the initiation codon (ATG) are expected to result in either loss of translation initiation, N-terminal truncation, or cause a shift in the mRNA reading frame; however, there is an in-frame methionine 29 amino acids from the initiation site, which may result in N-terminal truncation of unknown functional significance. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at