6-135463252-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001134831.2(AHI1):​c.804A>C​(p.Ser268Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00192 in 1,610,956 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S268S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0099 ( 22 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

AHI1
NM_001134831.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.160

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AHI1 (HGNC:21575): (Abelson helper integration site 1) This gene is apparently required for both cerebellar and cortical development in humans. This gene mutations cause specific forms of Joubert syndrome-related disorders. Joubert syndrome (JS) is a recessively inherited developmental brain disorder with several identified causative chromosomal loci. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
AHI1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Joubert syndrome 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
  • Joubert syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with ocular defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 6-135463252-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-135463252-T-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 128328.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.16 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00989 (1497/151384) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0339 (1396/41152). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0324. There are 22 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 696 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 22 AR,AD gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001134831.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
AHI1
NM_001134831.2
MANE Select
c.804A>Cp.Ser268Ser
synonymous
Exon 8 of 29NP_001128303.1
AHI1
NM_001134830.2
c.804A>Cp.Ser268Ser
synonymous
Exon 6 of 27NP_001128302.1
AHI1
NM_001350503.2
c.804A>Cp.Ser268Ser
synonymous
Exon 8 of 29NP_001337432.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
AHI1
ENST00000265602.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.804A>Cp.Ser268Ser
synonymous
Exon 8 of 29ENSP00000265602.6
AHI1
ENST00000367800.8
TSL:1
c.804A>Cp.Ser268Ser
synonymous
Exon 6 of 27ENSP00000356774.4
AHI1
ENST00000457866.6
TSL:1
c.804A>Cp.Ser268Ser
synonymous
Exon 7 of 28ENSP00000388650.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00987
AC:
1493
AN:
151266
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0339
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00495
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000210
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00578
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00259
AC:
642
AN:
247712
AF XY:
0.00195
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0344
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00227
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000187
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00149
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00109
AC:
1591
AN:
1459572
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000941
AC XY:
683
AN XY:
726066
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0352
AC:
1179
AN:
33450
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00257
AC:
115
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39624
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000186
AC:
16
AN:
86044
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52122
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00370
AC:
21
AN:
5682
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000792
AC:
88
AN:
1111518
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00285
AC:
172
AN:
60318
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
79
158
236
315
394
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00989
AC:
1497
AN:
151384
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00942
AC XY:
696
AN XY:
73904
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0339
AC:
1396
AN:
41152
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00494
AC:
75
AN:
15172
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000210
AC:
1
AN:
4756
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10442
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000191
AC:
13
AN:
67910
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00572
AC:
12
AN:
2098
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
70
139
209
278
348
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00319
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.0118
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.000329
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed.

Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joubert syndrome 3 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
4.8
DANN
Benign
0.61
PhyloP100
-0.16
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35528530; hg19: chr6-135784390; API