6-152234780-T-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate

The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.20417A>C(p.Asp6806Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000366 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000039 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SYNE1
NM_182961.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.58

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SYNE1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
arthrogryposis multiplex congenita 3, myogenic type
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina
autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
autosomal recessive myogenic arthrogryposis multiplex congenita
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

SYNE1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22750902).

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_182961.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	SYNE1	NM_182961.4	MANE Select	c.20417A>C	p.Asp6806Ala	missense	Exon 111 of 146	NP_892006.3
	SYNE1	NM_033071.5		c.20204A>C	p.Asp6735Ala	missense	Exon 110 of 146	NP_149062.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
SYNE1	ENST00000367255.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.20417A>C	p.Asp6806Ala	missense	Exon 111 of 146	ENSP00000356224.5
SYNE1	ENST00000423061.6	TSL:1	c.20204A>C	p.Asp6735Ala	missense	Exon 110 of 146	ENSP00000396024.1
SYNE1	ENST00000367256.9	TSL:1	n.4109A>C		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 26 of 61

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000318

AC:

AN:

251226

AF XY:

0.0000515

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000616

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000390

AC:

AN:

1461878

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000413

AC XY:

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000513

AC:

AN:

1111998

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.459

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74336

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41444

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5196

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.000214

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000302

ExAC

AF:

0.0000494

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:4

Aug 08, 2023

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge

Jan 31, 2020

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 05, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 13, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) Computational tools predict that this variant is not damaging.

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.059

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.33

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.52

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.60

Eigen

Benign

-0.45

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.33

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Benign

0.82

M_CAP

Benign

0.0067

MetaRNN

Benign

0.23

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.35

PhyloP100

3.6

PrimateAI

Benign

0.32

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.6

REVEL

Benign

0.13

Sift

Benign

0.059

Sift4G

Benign

0.099

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.20

MutPred

0.51

Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0564)

MVP

0.44

MPC

0.17

ClinPred

0.19

GERP RS

1.6

Varity_R

0.18

gMVP

0.14

Mutation Taster

=91/9

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over