6-30069909-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_021959.3(PPP1R11):c.*603T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.241 in 152,240 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,029 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021959.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_021959.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPP1R11 | NM_021959.3 | MANE Select | c.*603T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_068778.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPP1R11 | ENST00000376772.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*603T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000365963.3 | |||
| PPP1R11 | ENST00000376758.1 | TSL:2 | c.*603T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000365949.1 | |||
| PPP1R11 | ENST00000376763.5 | TSL:3 | c.*603T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000365954.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.241 AC: 36593AN: 151964Hom.: 6010 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0949 AC: 15AN: 158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.100 AC XY: 9AN XY: 90 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.241 AC: 36651AN: 152082Hom.: 6029 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.236 AC XY: 17521AN XY: 74344 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at