6-31740551-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_172166.4(MSH5):c.85C>T(p.Pro29Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0982 in 1,526,338 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,609 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_172166.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSH5 | NM_172166.4 | c.85C>T | p.Pro29Ser | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 25 | ENST00000375750.9 | NP_751898.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0930 AC: 14131AN: 152010Hom.: 830 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.126 AC: 15944AN: 126162 AF XY: 0.123 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0988 AC: 135706AN: 1374210Hom.: 7777 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0991 AC XY: 67201AN XY: 678122 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0930 AC: 14142AN: 152128Hom.: 832 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0996 AC XY: 7406AN XY: 74376 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF -
MSH5-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at