6-32828962-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_001290043.2(TAP2):c.2005G>A(p.Ala669Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00002 in 1,547,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001290043.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- MHC class I deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- MHC class I deficiency 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001290043.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAP2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2005G>A | p.Ala669Thr | missense | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000364032.3 | Q03519-1 | ||
| ENSG00000250264 | TSL:2 | c.1932+438G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000391806.2 | E7ENX8 | |||
| TAP2 | c.2038G>A | p.Ala680Thr | missense | Exon 13 of 13 | ENSP00000513734.1 | A0A8V8TNJ0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152114Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000396 AC: 6AN: 151398 AF XY: 0.0000614 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000208 AC: 29AN: 1395636Hom.: 1 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.0000232 AC XY: 16AN XY: 688352 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152114Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74316 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at