6-32829506-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001290043.2(TAP2):c.1826C>T(p.Ala609Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00202 in 1,614,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A609A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001290043.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- MHC class I deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAP2 | ENST00000374897.4 | c.1826C>T | p.Ala609Val | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 12 | 1 | NM_001290043.2 | ENSP00000364032.3 | ||
| ENSG00000250264 | ENST00000452392.2 | c.1826C>T | p.Ala609Val | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 15 | 2 | ENSP00000391806.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00951 AC: 1447AN: 152168Hom.: 13 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00276 AC: 694AN: 251316 AF XY: 0.00213 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00124 AC: 1818AN: 1461816Hom.: 20 Cov.: 54 AF XY: 0.00113 AC XY: 821AN XY: 727204 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00951 AC: 1449AN: 152286Hom.: 13 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00878 AC XY: 654AN XY: 74466 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
MHC class I deficiency Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at