6-33163724-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):c.5165C>T(p.Pro1722Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0196 in 1,613,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 535 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1722P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_080680.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL11A2 | NM_080680.3 | c.5165C>T | p.Pro1722Leu | missense_variant | 66/66 | ENST00000341947.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL11A2 | ENST00000341947.7 | c.5165C>T | p.Pro1722Leu | missense_variant | 66/66 | 5 | NM_080680.3 | P4 | |
COL11A2 | ENST00000374708.8 | c.4907C>T | p.Pro1636Leu | missense_variant | 64/64 | 5 | A1 | ||
COL11A2 | ENST00000477772.1 | n.955C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/9 | 2 | ||||
COL11A2 | ENST00000683572.1 | n.971C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/9 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0185 AC: 2813AN: 152178Hom.: 69 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0203 AC: 4962AN: 244856Hom.: 108 AF XY: 0.0202 AC XY: 2699AN XY: 133620
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0197 AC: 28847AN: 1460772Hom.: 466 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0201 AC XY: 14627AN XY: 726704
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0185 AC: 2813AN: 152296Hom.: 69 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0181 AC XY: 1349AN XY: 74464
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Pro1722Leu in Exon 66 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 2.6% (117/4486) of European Ameri can chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (h ttp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2229792). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 05, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 02, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 27, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Mar 12, 2022 | - - |
Fibrochondrogenesis 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Stickler Syndrome, Dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at