Menu
GeneBe

6-33164337-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):​c.5000G>A​(p.Arg1667His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00125 in 1,612,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1667S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A2
NM_080680.3 missense

Scores

1
5
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.456
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL11A2 (HGNC:2187): (collagen type XI alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. It is located on chromosome 6 very close to but separate from the gene for retinoid X receptor beta. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Proteolytic processing of this type XI chain produces PARP, a proline/arginine-rich protein that is an amino terminal domain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type III Stickler syndrome, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED syndrome), Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural type 13 deafness (DFNA13), and autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural type 53 deafness (DFNB53). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene is located nearby on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, COL11A2
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014077336).
BP6
Variant 6-33164337-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-33164337-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178321.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=9, Benign=2}. Variant chr6-33164337-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00116 (176/152286) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00559 (27/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00395. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 85 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 14 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
COL11A2NM_080680.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.5000G>A p.Arg1667His missense_variant 65/66 ENST00000341947.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
COL11A2ENST00000341947.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.5000G>A p.Arg1667His missense_variant 65/665 NM_080680.3 P4
COL11A2ENST00000374708.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4742G>A p.Arg1581His missense_variant 63/645 A1
COL11A2ENST00000477772.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.790G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 8/92
COL11A2ENST00000683572.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.806G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 8/9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
177
AN:
152168
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00559
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00575
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00191
AC:
469
AN:
246086
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00225
AC XY:
302
AN XY:
134180
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000664
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00181
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00590
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00264
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00126
AC:
1845
AN:
1460630
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00146
AC XY:
1060
AN XY:
726622
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00142
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00618
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000382
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000929
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00172
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152286
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00114
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00559
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00569
Alfa
AF:
0.00110
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00123
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00148
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.00201
AC:
237
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00191
EpiControl
AF:
0.00172

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJan 24, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024COL11A2: BP4, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 23, 2015p.Arg1667His in exon 65 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinica l significance because it has been identified in 0.18% (111/62708) of European c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs146555195). In addition, it has been seen by our laboratory in two individuals with hearing loss, neither of whom carried a clinically significant COL11A2 variant on the other allele and both of whom had an alternate genetic e xplanation for their hearing loss. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 18, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 53 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter of Genomic medicine, Geneva, University Hospital of GenevaAug 06, 2018This variant was identified in compound heterozygosity with a second variant in COL11A2 in a female patient with prelingual bilateral moderate hearing loss. -
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, IncJun 01, 2018- -
Stickler Syndrome, Dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Fibrochondrogenesis 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.099
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.024
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
0.11
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.11
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.32
N
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.086
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.18
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.29
Sift
Uncertain
0.028
D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;T;T
Vest4
0.26
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.42
ClinPred
0.011
T
GERP RS
4.9
gMVP
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146555195; hg19: chr6-33132114; API