6-33164453-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):​c.4884G>C​(p.Glu1628Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000772 in 1,567,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 137 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00074 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 125 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A2
NM_080680.3 missense

Scores

1
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.23

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL11A2 (HGNC:2187): (collagen type XI alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. It is located on chromosome 6 very close to but separate from the gene for retinoid X receptor beta. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Proteolytic processing of this type XI chain produces PARP, a proline/arginine-rich protein that is an amino terminal domain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type III Stickler syndrome, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED syndrome), Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural type 13 deafness (DFNA13), and autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural type 53 deafness (DFNB53). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene is located nearby on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]
COL11A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 13
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 53
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • fibrochondrogenesis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0053469837).
BP6
Variant 6-33164453-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-33164453-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 178663.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000743 (113/152116) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00989 (51/5158). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00773. There are 12 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 46 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 12 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL11A2NM_080680.3 linkc.4884G>C p.Glu1628Asp missense_variant Exon 65 of 66 ENST00000341947.7 NP_542411.2 P13942A0A0C4DFS1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL11A2ENST00000341947.7 linkc.4884G>C p.Glu1628Asp missense_variant Exon 65 of 66 5 NM_080680.3 ENSP00000339915.2 A0A0C4DFS1
COL11A2ENST00000374708.8 linkc.4626G>C p.Glu1542Asp missense_variant Exon 63 of 64 5 ENSP00000363840.4 Q4VXY6
COL11A2ENST00000477772.1 linkn.674G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 8 of 9 2
COL11A2ENST00000683572.1 linkn.690G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 8 of 9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000757
AC:
115
AN:
152000
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00115
AC:
208
AN:
181482
AF XY:
0.00115
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000991
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000404
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00414
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000775
AC:
1097
AN:
1415250
Hom.:
125
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000714
AC XY:
499
AN XY:
699332
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000123
AC:
4
AN:
32410
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000337
AC:
13
AN:
38530
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25172
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00355
AC:
133
AN:
37476
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00450
AC:
365
AN:
81108
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
49618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000190
AC:
1
AN:
5274
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000736
AC:
8
AN:
1087158
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00979
AC:
573
AN:
58504
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
46
92
137
183
229
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000743
AC:
113
AN:
152116
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000619
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
74346
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000386
AC:
16
AN:
41490
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000458
AC:
7
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00989
AC:
51
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00672
AC:
32
AN:
4762
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000812
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000873
ExAC
AF:
0.000941
AC:
110
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0270
AC:
94
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 01, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 15, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Sep 08, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Glu1628Asp in exon 65 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinica l significance because it has been identified in 1% (20/2022) of East Asian and in 0.6% (45/6934) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs2229790). -

Aug 19, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

COL11A2-related disorder Benign:1
Dec 16, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Stickler Syndrome, Dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Nov 29, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fibrochondrogenesis 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.093
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.50
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
7.8
DANN
Uncertain
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.011
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.71
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.64
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.032
N
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0053
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
PhyloP100
-1.2
PrimateAI
Benign
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.23
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.050
Sift
Benign
0.41
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.54
T;T;T
Vest4
0.16
MutPred
0.25
.;Loss of sheet (P = 0.0817);.;
MVP
0.62
MPC
0.31
ClinPred
0.031
T
GERP RS
1.0
gMVP
0.32
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2229790; hg19: chr6-33132230; API