6-35455772-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_021922.3(FANCE):c.274C>T(p.Arg92Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000496 in 1,613,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021922.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCE | NM_021922.3 | c.274C>T | p.Arg92Trp | missense_variant | 2/10 | ENST00000229769.3 | NP_068741.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCE | ENST00000229769.3 | c.274C>T | p.Arg92Trp | missense_variant | 2/10 | 1 | NM_021922.3 | ENSP00000229769.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000875 AC: 22AN: 251386Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000810 AC XY: 11AN XY: 135870
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000410 AC: 60AN: 1461810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 65 AF XY: 0.0000426 AC XY: 31AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74350
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Fanconi anemia complementation group E Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 26, 2020 | DNA sequence analysis of the FANCE gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.274C>T, in exon 2 that results in an amino acid change, p.Arg92Trp. This sequence change does not appear to have been previously described in patients with FANCE-related disorders and has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.032% in the African sub-population (dbSNP rs375195621). The p.Arg92Trp change affects a poorly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the FANCE protein that is not known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Arg92Trp substitution. Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Arg92Trp change remains unknown at this time. - |
Fanconi anemia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 31, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at