6-36293081-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001374623.1(PNPLA1):c.459C>T(p.Phe153Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.383 in 1,612,774 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 121,341 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.42 ( 14009 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.38 ( 107332 hom. )
Consequence
PNPLA1
NM_001374623.1 synonymous
NM_001374623.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.09
Genes affected
PNPLA1 (HGNC:21246): (patatin like phospholipase domain containing 1) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the patatin-like phospholipase (PNPLA) family, which is characterized by the presence of a highly conserved patatin domain. PNPLA family members have diverse lipolytic and acyltransferase activities, and are key elements in lipid metabolism. While other members of this family have been well characterized, the function of this gene remained an enigma. However, recent studies show that this gene is expressed in the skin epidermal keratinocytes, and has a role in glycerophospholipid metabolism in the cutaneous barrier. Consistent with these observations, mutations in this gene are associated with ichthyosis in human (autosomal recessive congenital ichthyoses, ARCI) and dog. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.29).
BP6
Variant 6-36293081-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-36293081-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257572.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-36293081-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.09 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.519 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNPLA1 | NM_001374623.1 | c.459C>T | p.Phe153Phe | synonymous_variant | 3/9 | ENST00000636260.2 | NP_001361552.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNPLA1 | ENST00000636260.2 | c.459C>T | p.Phe153Phe | synonymous_variant | 3/9 | 5 | NM_001374623.1 | ENSP00000490785.2 | ||
PNPLA1 | ENST00000457797.5 | c.462C>T | p.Phe154Phe | synonymous_variant | 3/8 | 1 | ENSP00000391868.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.422 AC: 63951AN: 151720Hom.: 13992 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
63951
AN:
151720
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.371 AC: 93102AN: 250940Hom.: 18226 AF XY: 0.372 AC XY: 50490AN XY: 135588
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
93102
AN:
250940
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
50490
AN XY:
135588
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.379 AC: 554323AN: 1460936Hom.: 107332 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.380 AC XY: 276218AN XY: 726798
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
554323
AN:
1460936
Hom.:
Cov.:
42
AF XY:
AC XY:
276218
AN XY:
726798
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.422 AC: 64002AN: 151838Hom.: 14009 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.417 AC XY: 30919AN XY: 74208
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
64002
AN:
151838
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
30919
AN XY:
74208
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1421
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 12, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 10 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Oct 25, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at