6-38890771-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1
The NM_001206927.2(DNAH8):c.8583+10G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00068 in 1,586,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001206927.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH8 | NM_001206927.2 | c.8583+10G>T | intron_variant | Intron 58 of 92 | ENST00000327475.11 | NP_001193856.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH8 | ENST00000327475.11 | c.8583+10G>T | intron_variant | Intron 58 of 92 | 5 | NM_001206927.2 | ENSP00000333363.7 | |||
DNAH8 | ENST00000359357.7 | c.7932+10G>T | intron_variant | Intron 56 of 90 | 2 | ENSP00000352312.3 | ||||
DNAH8 | ENST00000449981.6 | c.8583+10G>T | intron_variant | Intron 57 of 81 | 5 | ENSP00000415331.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000401 AC: 61AN: 152052Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000260 AC: 65AN: 250150Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000244 AC XY: 33AN XY: 135120
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000709 AC: 1017AN: 1433908Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.000653 AC XY: 467AN XY: 715174
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000407 AC: 62AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000323 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74382
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1
- -
DNAH8-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at