6-39816358-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001201427.2(DAAM2):c.-57+23893T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.543 in 152,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22,575 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001201427.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- nephrotic syndrome, type 24Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001201427.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAAM2 | NM_001201427.2 | MANE Select | c.-57+23893T>C | intron | N/A | NP_001188356.1 | |||
| DAAM2 | NM_015345.4 | c.-57+23215T>C | intron | N/A | NP_056160.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAAM2 | ENST00000274867.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.-57+23893T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000274867.4 | |||
| DAAM2 | ENST00000538976.5 | TSL:1 | c.-57+23215T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000437808.1 | |||
| DAAM2 | ENST00000475489.5 | TSL:1 | n.70+23893T>C | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.543 AC: 82451AN: 151928Hom.: 22556 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.543 AC: 82514AN: 152046Hom.: 22575 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.546 AC XY: 40552AN XY: 74326 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at