6-41798841-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001286554.2(USP49):c.1759A>G(p.Met587Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001286554.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001286554.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USP49 | MANE Select | c.1759A>G | p.Met587Val | missense | Exon 7 of 8 | NP_001273483.1 | Q70CQ1-1 | ||
| USP49 | c.1759A>G | p.Met587Val | missense | Exon 7 of 8 | NP_001371471.1 | Q70CQ1-1 | |||
| USP49 | c.1759A>G | p.Met587Val | missense | Exon 7 of 7 | NP_061031.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USP49 | MANE Select | c.1759A>G | p.Met587Val | missense | Exon 7 of 8 | ENSP00000507239.1 | Q70CQ1-1 | ||
| USP49 | TSL:1 | c.1759A>G | p.Met587Val | missense | Exon 7 of 7 | ENSP00000362097.1 | Q70CQ1-2 | ||
| USP49 | TSL:5 | c.1725+34A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000362101.1 | Q5T3E1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at