Genetic Variant CUL7:p.Leu530Leu (chr6-43049642-T-G) – ACMG Classification: Benign (-10 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_014780.5(CUL7):c.1590A>C(p.Leu530Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000359 in 1,614,120 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000036 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CUL7
NM_014780.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.410

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CUL7 (HGNC:21024): (cullin 7) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase complex. The encoded protein interacts with TP53, CUL9, and FBXW8 proteins. Defects in this gene are a cause of 3M syndrome type 1 (3M1). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2009]

CUL7 links:

KLC4 (HGNC:21624): (kinesin light chain 4) Predicted to be located in cytoplasm and microtubule. Predicted to be part of kinesin complex. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

KLC4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).

BP6

Variant 6-43049642-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-43049642-T-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 260434.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.41 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000394 (6/152290) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00116 (6/5194). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000502. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 4 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_014780.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
CUL7	NM_014780.5	MANE Select	c.1590A>C	p.Leu530Leu	synonymous	Exon 7 of 26	NP_055595.2
CUL7	NM_001168370.2		c.1686A>C	p.Leu562Leu	synonymous	Exon 7 of 26	NP_001161842.2
CUL7	NM_001374872.1		c.1686A>C	p.Leu562Leu	synonymous	Exon 7 of 26	NP_001361801.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
CUL7	ENST00000265348.9	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1590A>C	p.Leu530Leu	synonymous	Exon 7 of 26	ENSP00000265348.4
CUL7	ENST00000674100.1		c.1686A>C	p.Leu562Leu	synonymous	Exon 7 of 26	ENSP00000501292.1
CUL7	ENST00000674134.1		c.1686A>C	p.Leu562Leu	synonymous	Exon 7 of 26	ENSP00000501068.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000107

AC:

AN:

251392

AF XY:

0.000110

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000356

AC:

AN:

1461830

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000358

AC XY:

AN XY:

727214

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00123

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53412

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111966

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41550

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00116

AC:

AN:

5194

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.458

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000267

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000604

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

3M syndrome 1

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided

Benign:1

May 06, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

7.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.65

PhyloP100

-0.41

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over